Discussion about this post

User's avatar
BassPlayerDude's avatar

I'm glad but not surprised that you found reasons for optimism or at least tiny little rays of hope.

But I couldn't entirely suppress an

ironic smile at "wins and losses are long past mattering." With a couple of very rare and extremely brief exceptions, that's been the mantra of Royals fans for four full decades now. Note to Royals: it's getting very, very old.

Expand full comment
Joel Kellen's avatar

As much as I ping you and am frustrated (maybe it sounds like complaining) with this team, hell, with this organization I agree with you 100% that Marsh could be something and Heasley needs to be tried in the bullpen. I’d actually argue all failed starters need to be tried in the bullpen….period. If you aren’t going to trade them, get value out of them in the pen….which means move your entire damn pen already. Does the front office need major overhaul (keep JJ that’s fine)? Yes, absolutely but I see some good things happening. Marsh has the tools….what I can’t figure out is why the results are ALWAYS meh to not good the last few years. But at least the coaches are working with the right tools. You’re may disagree with this, but my eyes see more tools to mold with Marsh than with Lynch. Bobby Witt will be an all-star. I hope that’s because he’s earned it and not just because they have to have someone. But I’d put money down he’s an all-star within the next couple years. He may never be as good as everyone hoped, but he’s a start. Garcia…he can play. Where, IDK, but at least he can play. Vinnie, Witt, and Garcia. Is it enough, no. But its a start.

Here’s one for you. Based on your evaluation right now. Can Isbel and Waters be in the same outfield? Yes or no…..just simple yes or no because I know it all depends. But I’m asking if both can be starters. Right now…..I’d have to say no.

Expand full comment
34 more comments...

No posts