Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Patrick Glancy's avatar

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say it would redeem him (because Manfred sucks), but if he actually manages to end blackouts, the Commish's stock will skyrocket with me, because Bally (and Sinclair) suck even more.

Expand full comment
zdebman's avatar

A few pointers on a possible Sinclair/Bally's RSN bankruptcy. Under BK law, filing BK creates an automatic stay (meaning that the other party to a contract with the RSN such as the Royals can't either terminate the contract or sue the RSN for damages without the BK court's permission). However, in reasonably short order after the case commences, the RSN is either going to have restart making the required rights fee payments to the Royals or the BK court will eventually let the Royals and the other sports franchises terminate their rights grants to the RSN. The lenders to the RSNs are going to have the most incentive to fund paying the rights fees, as without the rights contracts the RSNs and the lenders basically have nothing. I'd expect the RSNs to eventually be taken over by the lenders and then sold to someone else. In a perfect world, that would be MLB.TV and then MLB.TV would be able to lift the blackout for MLB.TV subsribers who would pay a local team surcharge that looks a lot like the $15-20 /month that Bally's was trying to charge but no one trusted them enough to pay it.

I agree with David, that this could be a short-term financial hit for the Royals (which might be another reason they are not expanding payroll this year) but potentially far better for the Royals and baseball more broadly in the future.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts