Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul M. Wade's avatar

I missed the game live today and just watched a little bit ago. The way Salvy is taking a beating behind the plate has got worried about him making it through a full season as he keeps getting older. We need his bat and leadership in the lineup most days. It seems to me we need to start next year with Melendez and him splitting catching duties on 50/50 or 60/40 pace. I know he wouldn't like it and they could split DH duties. My fear is concussions or worse if they keep catching him so much. I also wish they were playing Isbel and Oliveras and sit O'Hearn and DFA Dyson. I am growing sick and tired from watching those 2 play almost every day.

Expand full comment
Steve Yeakel's avatar

This is more a comment on your Royals Review article today, and I can see how it will be better for the Royals to be more transactional - but I am also a little nervous about trading any of our top prospects, along the lines of "A fool and his money are soon parted." In terms of being the fool, we sure seemed to give up some of our top prospects to get Cueto and Zobrist, which helped create the valley after. I can agree that if we really had to give up that much, that a World Series title is worth it. On the other hand, I do not see any other clubs offering up any of their top prospects for our guys now. I can understand that it may be because we do not have a Cueto or Zobrist on our club - but, then again, I could see Whit being as good as Zobrist. And I would be (and was) in favor of trading him for a top prospect as, like Zobrist, he is getting closer to the end than to the prime of his career. BUT - I do not see anyone trading Tatis, or Acuna - OR anyone else that can be a plus part of their championship lineup. It seems to me that first you plug in all our best pieces to make up your best championship lineup - and then, perhaps, trade spare parts to fill any holes you still have. But, in our case, if we are looking for above average, championship pieces, then, until they prove otherwise, I keep MJ and Pratto. Any any young starters, until enough have proven themselves, both as starters and depth. Same with relievers. If I still have a hole in CF - then I keep Taylor - very good with the glove, below average with the bat - as the sole hole on the team - or spend some money, not trade a top prospect, to get someone even better. As I look back at this, I am sounding very anti-transactional - but only to the extent of not letting go of top prospects that we are blessed to already have in our system.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts