Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tracey's avatar

I'm pretty much as optimistic about the Royals as you can get. David, the fact that you, a much more level-headed realist than I, wrote an article that pretty much echoes my logic for the upcoming season makes me very happy.

Like you, I can't say I am predicting a 90-win season, but I think it is definitely in the realm of possibility. A 34-win improvement is nearly unheard of but as you've pointed out, winning 56 games last year took a LOT of bad luck. Flip the Royals' luck to neutral and now it's not so unsurmountable. Now let's imagine a world in which the 2023 Royals got 6-8 wins luckier than the numbers indicate they deserved - now we're looking at a 68-74 win team. Jumping from 74 wins to 90 is a nice improvement, but not unreasonable.

Now when you add in the (potential) extra wins from full seasons of MVP-candidate Witt and Cy Young-candidate Ragans, the extra wins we expect Wacha and Lugo to provide, and the boost adding Renfroe, Smith, Anderson and Stratton should provide, 90 wins seems very attainable - and we haven't yet really counted on anyone improving year-to-year. We also haven't considered what having Velazquez for a full season does. Yes, it probably takes a lot of good luck (and very little bad luck) and basically no regression, but a lot of playoff teams benefit from good luck.

I fully acknowledge that it's not a brilliant piece of analysis to say that a 56-win team has a lot of room to improve, but when you break it down, it really is striking just how many ways the Royals can build a winning season.

My expectation (which is where my optimism really shines through) is a .500 season, which is a fantastic 25-win improvement.

Expand full comment
Michael Legero's avatar

Uplifting column. Sometimes I need to read your column twice. I had about twenty pre spring trainings with the Red Sox and now about 40 with the Royals.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts